>>8054
>What narrative? The only narrative applies to the left where once you dissect their side everything is flimsy half-truths and when it's not it's outright lies. When the left is always setting the rules, every side on the issue is relegated to a narrative, an opinion, a perspective - subjectivity. My advice to you is to realize there is an objective truth and there is a method to discovering it.
The narrative of race in general, the one that involves a denial of most research/progress in regards to sociology, psychology, history, culture, and economics to support a simplistic worldview.
This goes beyond left or right, and no matter how much you hate the bullshit of any political party (spoiler: they all suck), it doesn't have any bearing on the objective truth.
>Confirmation bias? That's laughable. There's plenty of confirmation bias to go around but I prefer its proper name, evidence. With evidence you never get tired of being right but to people like you, it's always confirmation bias. When you discover that terms like that were invented to shelter lies, you'll realize why you spent so much time believing in "narratives."
If you're cool with bullshitting yourself, whatever, but you really don't see a problem with bitching about the left and their flimsy half truths when you're literally doing the exact same shit and claiming objectivity?
Narratives exist and are spun constantly. They exist objectivel. You wanna deny the concept of narratives but yammer on about "objective trooths"?
>I don't get it, are you being ironic?
Pretty much yeah. Inbreeding joke mostly.
>So wait, every person ever who wanted pure genes is actually repressing their fears of getting cucked by another race and becoming homosexual?
Nah, just you. (in case you couldn't tell, this is more irony)
Nobody's holding you at gunpoint and telling you to fuck a black chick. It's your kid, if you choose to even have one. Your idea of "purity" however, is a restricting dogma that severely limits your choices in mate selection based on archaic bullshit.
>I didn't realize it was that elaborate an issue. Is this one of those things you learn when you "challenge the narrative?" You're a pretty funny guy.
You challenged narratives to get here dude.
Quit focusing on the terms like a politically correct feminist for a sec, replace narrative with belief, religion, ideology, brainchild, or whatever other word will make you stop bitching about semantics.
>Last time I checked, ayyliums like the reptilians genetically modify automotan races that better serve their masters. Remember anon, grey lives matter.
I don't get it, are you being ironic?
>You want to know what's interesting about mixed race demographics? It's rarely ever counted. In the US almost every form inquiring your race has the same option for White, just White or White-hispanic. But you will never see one for mixed blacks.
Depends on the form. There's been an increasing number of forms that have a non-hispanic mixed option, though most will have "other".
>There are a ton of blacks in the US that are mixed. Most of the ones represented in the media are clearly brown but they are always counted as black. If you closely examine the most successful "blacks" in various industries they are always mixed to varying degrees. Once you realize that, you realize it's comical for them to even identify with their african heritage because these brown people, mulattos, are a mixed race. I can say for certain that this black acquaintance of yours is mixed.
Most people in general are mixed, especially in America, a massive country occupied by mostly foreigners from different countries from all over the world.
>Black areas are famous for having whites literally leaving behind their homes that their grandparents built.
That or they'd just brutally murder the new black neighbors because their grandpappies told em niggers taint no good.
>To make it even more complicated, these comparably more intelligent "blacks" are a minority within a minority. Not even with a 50/50 mixture will that guarantee you a stable and intelligent individual. African genes are usually the ones expressed through consecutive generations. In other words, black genes are more dominant in prevailing generations. Once you muddy the gene pool it takes a lot of blood to make it clean, and the overall process is a gigantic mess. But thanks to the media and how demographics are counted, the vast majority of people still blindly believe that brown-looking blacks that are successful is as black as the native african in a arid third world country who's ancestors never left Africa, areas where missionaries work and routinely return to their home country never expecting that they would become racist. It's comically absurd when you realize how many civil rights representatives are mixed to the point that they have no majorly identifying traits with the greater majority of those they represent. Some are so mixed that their skin color is barely a tan - and yet they count as "black."
Another reason why race in general makes no god damned sense. Of course, this raises the question of whether the problem is the genetic heritage of the blacks in shitty-africa, or the history and culture of incessant conflict exacerbated by other countries taking advantage of the chaos, with some here and there helping to look good but an overall change in structure and civilization never really taking place except in population hubs like South Africa and Egypt which is unfortunately close to the middle-east clusterfuck.
Considering the success of even mildly mixed people with mostly African genes in first world countries, the evidence seems to be pointing to this shit being complicated as all hell, and no simplistic narrative rooted in fears and biases will ever come very close to a solution.
>So you're right to keep in mind the ghetto whites, but guess what? They're the minority within this particular minority. Whites are the minority of the entire world, but they're the ones who are pressured into race-mixing.
This is the left being the left in general, a pack of whiny sycophants who are generally worse than even the most overt racists because they're 25% good intentions, 49% white-man's-burden era thinking, and 25% non-issues. Again, fuck who you want, have kids with a woman you love (or don't, I'm not your dad).
>So you're right to keep in mind the ghetto whites, but guess what? They're the minority within this particular minority. Whites are the minority of the entire world, but they're the ones who are pressured into race-mixing. Hey after all, we think actors like will smith is a cool guy and he's "black." Why not have a world with more people like him? Wait though, he's not just black he's brown and that means he has a set of white genes that provided those talents to him. Watch a clip of Fresh Prince again with what I said in mind and try to hold back the laughter that this guy is supposed to be playing a ghetto rapper.
If you think Will Smith was playing a ghetto rapper in the Fresh Prince, you probably haven't actually watched any of it. The whole show deconstructs the idea of black=ghetto, it's kind of the fucking point.
The intro is him getting his ass handed to him by real thugs before his disappointed mother decides to send him to live with his rich family across the country.
>Then do it again but realize that was the plan all along; have a light brown "black" guy represent ghetto rappers. That will solve race relations; have people unexposed to actual blacks identity blacks with mixed brown people who are god actors.
What, have all people with African heritage on TV be portrayed as spear chucking warmongers who sell drugs and starve to death in ghettos when they can't hunt enough lions to fund their rap careers?
Maybe the solution to race relations is to quit exacerbating shit with actions and political policies rooted in junk ideologies that should have died centuries ago when they lead to senseless massacres and widespread general misery for pretty much all parties involved.
>In the event that mixture is inevitable and thoroughly rampant, let's say evenly distributed because hey equality, white genes will get muddied so much that there won't be any left. Same for asians. There's no good outcome from any of this mixing. But at least everyone will finally be "black."
It probably is inevitable. You can teach your child all you want about genetic purity and the importance of preserving the white race, but if he drops one nut in a black girl or she gets one black creampie then whoops! There goes your "purity".
You wanna ignore the objective truth to the complexity of humankind, cool. You're probably mostly wrong though, and the evidence becomes apparent the moment you look deeply and objectively at the world you live in.
