>>7317
>Let them be miserable and alone.
I think the women of Russia, after going through their communist phase, are starting to return to femininity. The current generation of women are learning from the previous and, despite the feminist dogma, are re-embracing femininity. They (albeit begrudgingly) acknowledge the necessity of men and so they're willing to accept their place.
>Men can still have kids in their 70s
Woah, woah now. Even though this is true, let's not act like there's nothing wrong with that. You should know that the likelihood of a child inheriting genetic defects increases with the age of either of the child's parents. It's known that the chances of a woman having a child with down's syndrome skyrockets once they pass 35 however this does not mean that it's okay for old men to sire children.
Firstly, there's Autism. Secondly, there's the generational/cultural gap (although I suppose that's less of a problem since the essence of masculinity which all men need to have has been distilled thus allowing you to be a masculine role model, regardless of your age).
>Where I live there's both the old men with young asian wifes
According to what I've read, those young asian wifes aren't loyal. They'll tell you that they need to phone to speak to their "brother" and may even ask you to pay for their "brother" to come over to the country. (To be fair though, typically, those old guys know about these things and are just paying for company)
This situation is not ideal but tolerable nonetheless. The number of men who'll go into old age alone with no family and have to import an asian wife in a healthy society will never be that dramatic.
>and the women in their 40s marrying a guy in his early 20s
I've rarely heard about this but the few times I have, it's been stated that those men are on a clock. They have no business, no assets, etc. Their only value is their good looks. They argue that most relationships have an unknown clock and this man is basically completely dependent on the woman. He's sold his most valuable asset: his independence and now, in order to minimise the damage from the potential fallout, he can't build anything else for himself so when the times comes, he's a sitting duck. In a sense, he is in control as she's the one who suffers from the fallout (i.e. alimony payments, etc.) but nonetheless, the man lives a life where his only hobby is weightlifting. I don't know if we should really live in a society where it's considered okay for young, virile men to attach themself to a woman of such advanced age.
The whole purpose of marriage in the end was that it was basically the government's sanctioning of reproduction. In a marriage between an older woman and a younger man, the older woman most likely cannot bear children or she can only bear defective children. An old man is guaranteed to produce defective children. Both of these examples of marriages that you've provided are scenarios where it is very clear from the outset that with these marriages, reproduction is not the focus and so I think these things decay the root of marriage and thus, the root of the nuclear family. I don't think they should be outlawed however I do think the fact that its practitioners are socially ostracized is a good thing.
Embed related, starting from 3:09 or just follow the link:
https://youtu.be/NXJ3V55ii-U?t=3m9s
>People talk shit but why let this get to you
I want to be conscious of how my actions affect other people. If I'm going to hurt others, I want it to be for good reason. If I'm going to be hurt by others, I want it to be for good reason. I want to be liked by others and I see nothing wrong with this.
>Better then just do what you think is right and what makes you happy
Our actions affect those around us. I thought /fringe/ was all about raising your awareness and karma and stuff. This kind of sounds like moral relativism being used to justify hedonism.
