i seriously doubt most of the people on /pol/ are capable of getting through that book, much less understanding what is in it
posting my evola notes itt as i go along
>Naturally, we are not dealing here with normal existence, but with those possible forms of it that are already differentiated, that have a
certain intensity, while still being defined ίη a chaotic ambience, ίη the domain of pure contingency. They are not infrequent today, and ίη the
times to come they will surely proliferate. The state ίη question is that of the man who is self-confident through having as the essential center
of his personality not life, but Being. He can encounter everything, abandon himself to everything, and open himself to everything without
losing himself. He accepts every experience, ηο longer ίη order to prove and know himself, but to unfold all his possibilities ίη view οί the transformations that they can work ίη him, and of the new contents that offer and reveal themselves οη this path.
p. 65 rtt
>He sets himself above the moral plane not with pathos and polemics but with objectivity, hence through knowledge - the knowledge of causes and effects - and through conduct that has this knowledge as its only basis - RTT
https://web.archive.org/web/20130312043104/http://www.oswaldmosley.com/julius-evola/