>>90417
>1, skeptics are different from seekers
Except I'm not some kind of awful skeptic that you keep thinking I am.
It's 1 thing to embrace skepticism to the level that you were attempting to explain and berate. That's not what I am. Will you believe me though?
Like I'm saying, it's one thing to be your idea of "skeptic".
It's a different thing when someone is simply skeptical about what they find or read, or hear.
Pay attention to what I'm trying to illustrate now, if you manage to turn yourself around and read this post.
It's almost like what I had written didn't register in your mind, when one of the few things I did was show concern that you may be wrong and that this idea of there being ' Wingmakers in the future ' is made up.
>Seekers have positive karma at least while skeptics are just ignorant little babies.
Personal opinions—one of which doesn't apply to me—that I didn't need to know.
Seekers seek, that's it.
You burden your mind with this opinion of skeptics, along the way you burden the mind of the reader who has to wade through it when you post it in public (especially when sharing "the most profound realization one can have in this life").
>experiental knowledge
I already had an understanding of the concept of experiential knowledge. If a person fails to pass on his/her knowledge successfully (through conventional means of communication), then guiding the learner to the means by which they will acquire the knowledge is the way.
This isn't where you've ended up though, because you still haven't responded to my request/questions for a brief version of your insight.
>So, thus… I have nothing more to say for it will fall on deaf ears.
Your making it appear as though I'm not paying attention, and that I've been inconsiderately discarding everything you (the OP) have posted.
Wrong. I became more careful after I looked up the origins of the claims of a person (Al Bielek) who you thought was useful to listen to.
"Nothing more to say".
It seems you're just not capable or desirous of answering either of the few questions in my previous post.
Rather you seem to kid around like a jokester, no one to be taken seriously. And personally, I haven't written you off completely.
>Do you want or even deserve to be taken past the 4D control structure in this life?
Make fun all you will, but this is—so far—the only thing I found in your thread that's worth thinking about.
To feel truly deserving…but of what? The "fourth density"?
On the same note, to feel deserving of a reward is a matter of achieving either worthiness or redemption.
If you have any evident depth in your realizations, we'll see this depth when you share your thoughts on why (or when) a human is ever worthy enough to have a greater life.