>>85961
Shill sophistry detected.
>and there are other interests at work. He's not your puppet and you simply cannot force anything on anyone.
Right now the choice comes down to a dichotomy
Globalism and rule by left wing technocrat sociopaths (Hillary)
Nationalism, or at least the perception of it, with an individual who will at least facilitate the time needed to mount a cultural and physical resistance to the influences trying to push the social and political ends of the camp Hillary represents.
These are our choices, there is no in-between.
>Furthermore, why the fuck have you chosen this man? Donald is very materialistic, cares about wealth, sex, status, hyuge buildings, golden decorations and is generally not the most kind and loving man. Isn't trying to force Trump into being a force of 'good' an uphill battle? Why do you think he will sacrifice himself for a greater good?
Hillary definitely won't if you believe Hillary is not objectively a worse person, with worse intentions and representing a worse agenda, you're either horribly misguided or as I suspect, a blatant shill.
>Also, Kek is a force of chaos and darkness.
In native american culture frogs represent a harbinger of danger and chaos, and the rise of kek is significant indicator of the unstable and dangerous social times we now live in. Simply put, we have no choice now but to be awake to the danger around us (embrace kek), or to remain ignorant and to virtue signal in vain against the inevitable.
To embrace kek is to embrace the chaos, and to adapt and transform it into an outcome befitting our interests.
>You're trying to change the world by forcing an improbable mishmash of stupid choices on a Yankee businessman.
You're definitely either a retarded leftist or a shill.