>>116018
>>115974
https://www.reddit.com/r/Mainlander/comments/5r8wn2/the_immanent_philosophy_of_philipp_mainländer/
Here are some resources on this great thinker.
>>115983
>all-knowing god
>it would be curious to see what would happen
Well, think that through again, will you?
>version of the Hindu mythological model
>consciousness viewed us a burden
Not really.
But yeah, it is "a version" of creation myths in many religions - Hindu, but for example Nordic one too, in which world came to be as a result of sacrifice of some God, or the universe being God's body, decomposing or not.
>>115990
>>115991
And why exactly do you dismiss it? What makes you so qualified to say that this is right and this is wrong? One can conceive of a beginningless, eternal universe which nonetheless undergoes cyclic processes of creation, preservation and dissolution (which is a case in a number of philosophies), which could fit into Mainlander's ideas. That "meta-universe" could undergo cycles, and in each cycle a new universe would form out of nothingness and later return to it, thus each universe having it's beginning and end.